Alt Right 101 | The Reality of Race | #9

Video Version:

Audio Version can be found HERE.

In This Episode We Discuss:

  • 1:33 What is the basic understanding of race realism?
  • 6:16 How race is more than skin deep
  • 12:44 The controversy regarding race and IQ
  • 16:10 The argument of outliers and averages
  • 21:33 Emotional responses from the left to racial realities
  • 31:12 Unrealistic expectations for IQ growth
  • 34:40 Accusations of superiority and censorship of facts
  • 43:44 What can we learn from race realism

A BANNED Argument for Human Subspecies

This video was banned from YouTube, but uploaded to Bitchute.

I once had a former friend who called me up to end the friendship because I made the same claim from this video on my blog. That the human race has subspecies. We have different IQ’s, different immune systems, different brain sizes, different skeletal structures when examined by modern scientific study of genomes. But claiming such in a world driven by fanatical egalitarianism is heresy, punishable by deplatforming, firing from one’s job, public humiliation, and so forth. 

Human biodiversity is the new plate tectonics. It’s the new evolution. Both of which were controversial when they were first proposed as legitimate science. And it’s my sincere hope that one day saying you don’t believe in human biodiversity, will be held in the same regard as those who might still claim that the Earth is indeed flat.

Here’s a link to the video, narrated by Tara McCarthy.

Is the trust gone?

This morning I woke up to this tweet from the president.

Donald J. Trump‏
Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!…..

The first thought to run through my mind was, “traitor.” Wasn’t this the very first thing Trump claimed he would accomplish? To end DACA?

I see a mixed response on Twitter. Some say it’s the end of America while others say that Trump must compromise to get what we want. I tend to side with the former rather than the latter. Because at the end of the day, there’s no compromising with the left. The idea that you have to let some things go in order to get what you want when dealing with the Democrats is a myth. Read Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and you’ll understand that compromise is something that’s done by the right. Not the left. The left takes advantage of this concept in every way. They wonder how long they can get away with it before anyone notices. Give an inch, and they take a mile. Because the left wants anarchy. Not order. And compromise is a thing orderly people do.

Remember how once gays got to marry that issue was supposed to be over? Oh wait… then they wanted to adopt, then they wanted to be “included” and more “diversity”, and then wanted to be promoted in kid’s television and movies, then they wanted transgender rights, then they wanted kids to be permitted to have transgender surgery, then they wanted to normalize pedophilia. See a pattern here?

This is why acknowledging race is so important. This isn’t about young adults who are such good people who have jobs but were brought over here illegally. It’s about understanding how Hispanic people are mostly r selected individuals who breed like r selected individuals. Hispanics have always voted 70/30 for the left. And the more you have in the country, the more votes the left will obtain. You will never have an abundance of based conservative Hispanics who hate identity politics because the left is the party of free stuff taken from the white man through taxation. Texas will become Northern Mexico, and if that happens and Texas goes blue, you will never ever in a million years have a Republican president in office ever again. The left knows this. Compromise should never have been an option.

Demographics is destiny. 

Ann was right all along. Only now that the Senate has passed along some bullshit document condemning “white supremacists”, (meaning whites who don’t like the idea of being dispossessed) don’t expect those death squads to be very successful.

Hispanics can’t maintain social security. Boomers won’t leave a prosperous country to their descendants. Millennials can’t compete with halted wages because Juanita will work for less than minimum wage and no bathroom breaks. And Generation Z can’t grow up fast enough. Not that it would matter. Voting in another Republican got us another man who is willing to take the side of the neocons and those who voted Trump will never trust the Republican establishment ever again. The white man will become a diaspora if DACA goes through. And then everyone will wonder why all of a sudden the country’s economy floundered and can’t be maintained. Hmmm…. I wonder what could have happened? 

Yesterday a music video was posted by a rapper of a white child being hung by a noose for slavery repartitions. How much more evidence do people need to understand that if the left wins the war, they will kill us for losing? Every single country where whites are a minority, they’re persecuted to the point of outright genocide. But I can only do so much to make people see this simple truth. If we lose, we will be killed for it. Maybe not tomorrow. Maybe not in thirty to forty years. But one day, we will be.

Still not convinced? Think I’m being extreme or fatalistic? Allow James Allsup and others to explain around minute 4.


When the owner of a Dairy Queen has to defend his choice to say that he supports “God and country”, you know we’ve progressed into #ClownUniverse.

A Wisconsin Dairy Queen owner is defending a sign describing his restaurant as “politically incorrect” for its unabashed support for “God and country.”

The sign at the franchise in Kewaskum notifies patrons that staff may say “Merry Christmas,” ”Happy Easter” and “God Bless America,” among other things.

Owner Kevin Scheunemann tells WDJT-TV he “felt the sign was appropriate to hang in terms of being transparent about the views of the owner and staff supporting God and country.”

One customer who apparently doesn’t agree took a picture of the sign and complained about it on Dairy Queen’s page on Facebook.

The chain tells the station the sign “expresses the views of this independent owner only” and doesn’t speak for the company or any other franchise owners.

This on the same day that Portland Oregon’s police department decided to get rid of their list of gang members because it might incite racial hatred given that it was mostly composed of minorities.

Portland police will no longer maintain a database of suspected gang members, due to concerns that the vast majority of people with the gang label are racial minorities.

Starting Oct. 15, the Portland Police Bureau will end the 20-year practice of issuing gang member designations, which police say can lead to “unintended consequences” and a lifelong stigma even for those who have given up the gang lifestyle. Officials intend to notify the approximately 300 people on the gang list that the bureau will purge all records related to the designations, The Oregonian reported.

“There are still criminal gang members. That doesn’t go away because we don’t have a gang designation,” said Capt. Mike Krantz, according to The Oregonian. “We’re not pretending gang violence doesn’t exist. We’re just taking this one thing away.”

I guess the gangs just weren’t white enough for them to think it was a matter of concern. It might also verify racial “stereotypes” that we now have scientific evidence for. Oops.

But Dairy Queen owners who support their god and their country are clearly out of line.

The saying “facts are racist” just doesn’t cut it.

#ClownUniverse is the only way to describe it.



Murray speaks at Harvard

There was a time when things such as evolution and plate tectonics were considered taboo and anyone who spoke of these concepts were black listed as radicals. Race realism is the new evolution.

I first became familiar with Charles Murray when he did an interview with Stefan Molyneux. Speaking of the link between race and IQ cost Murray dearly. And it was published over twenty years ago. 

It’s only when white liberals have personal experiences of being surrounded by other races that they sometimes (certainly not always, but sometimes) learn that there is a definite difference between us.

Until then, they continue to call those trying to start the discussion the usual names. Hateful. Bigots. Racist. Etc…

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Students gathered at Harvard University on Wednesday to denounce a speech by an author who co-wrote a book discussing racial differences in intelligence and touched off a boisterous protest earlier this year in Vermont.

Chanting “black, brown, Asian, white, Harvard united for human rights” and “you can’t turn us around,” dozens of students stood on the front lawn of the university’s Museum of Natural History to protest the appearance of Charles Murray as his speech got underway inside.

Murray, a political scientist who co-authored the 1994 book “The Bell Curve,” has said his views are misunderstood. His speech on Wednesday was closed to the media.

Student speakers, part of the organizing Black Students Association and the Undergraduate Council’s Black Caucus, condemned what they say is Murray’s hateful rhetoric, which they believe is an attack on the existence of minorities.

“He’s trying to whitewash our existence,” said Ian Hayes, a 19-year-old sophomore. “He isn’t misunderstood, he’s wrong — plain and simple.”

One of the organizers of the demonstration, Anwar Omeish, a 21-year-old junior from Fairfax, Virginia, said Murray’s ideas are “flawed.”

“If it’s about contributions to global conversations, his is not a particularly worthy one,” Omeish said.

A parallel talk at the university’s northwest building, involving professors and students, was held shortly after the demonstration. The professors identified Murray as an empirically discredited and overtly racist speaker whose work is heavily reliant on biological determinism.

Murray’s speech at Vermont’s Middlebury College in March prompted a demonstration that involved up to eight masked people. A Middlebury professor suffered a neck injury during a subsequent physical confrontation. Dozens of students were disciplined.

Murray’s Harvard appearance was sponsored by the Open Campus Initiative, a student-run group that advocates free expression and has been inviting provocative speakers.

The Southern Poverty Law Center labels Murray a white nationalist, but he denies that.

One thing is certain. Don’t send your kids to college unless they’re going for a STEM degree. Some say we need to take over these institutions. But when I read articles such as this showcasing students who aren’t even able to listen to contradictory ideas without mouthing off the same rhetoric they’re liberal professors teach them, it makes me think that these institutions aren’t worth saving. Let them fall. We can create new ones from the ashes of the old. 

We used to go to university to learn new ideas. Now we go to destroy them. But race realism won’t die. Because as long as we don’t discuss race realism in a realistic way, we won’t come anywhere close to solving the problems that plague our societies.



Racial Differences Broken Down, Then BANNED

Jared Taylor, in classic Jared-esque form, broke down the differences between the races, calmly, intellectually, biologically, genetically… and politely.

So naturally it was banned from YouTube. Or shadow banned rather.

Race Realism/human biodiversity is the new evolution. Those who dared to discuss evolution or even plate tectonics decades or over a century ago were deemed completely insane. Their work was threatened and some even prayed for their heretical souls. Now, both those sciences are widely accepted and respected.

Jared Taylor is a brave man who is before his time. I hope one day he will be regarded as the leader who dared push boundaries to protect the interests of those who don’t even realize that they do in fact have interests.

Follow the link below to see the video. It’s been posted on Bitchute, where my videos will be soon.

Jews call for outlawing right wingers in France

If France actually allows the Jews to pass a law banning racism from those running for public office, it will mean France is officially cooked. Remember when I made a video called “Will France Fall to Islam?” and lots of morons told me I was being paranoid and a radical?


On Wednesday LICRA demanded that, within the framework of his draft law for the moralisation of public life, Home Secretary François Bayrou render ineligible [for political office] persons convicted of racism, antisemitism, holocaust denial or discrimination.


This relates to Macron’s campaign promise to clean up politics by requiring that anyone standing for political office have a criminal record free of convictions for misappropriation of public funds, corruption, trading influence, and a list of various other things all related to the abuse of political office. But Alain Jakubowicz, president of the Ligue internationale contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme (Licra) [International League Against Racism and Antisemitism] wants this list to be extended.

Moralisation, a matter of “Republican ethics”. But this list includes “a major omission”, he emphasises: “the expression of racism, antisemitism and holocaust denial, justification of crimes against humanity or terrorism and, more broadly, practices that lead to discrimination do not appear in the planned text’s field of application.” “We all know the effects that these crimes produce on our national cohesion and the weakening of our values of liberty, equality and fraternity,” and “elected officials have a special responsibility” in this sense, he adds. “The moralisation of political life is not just about probity. It is also a question of republican ethics,” concludes the LICRA president.

This would block Marine Le Pen and many other Front National candidates from standing for office since many have convictions for speech “offences”. “Hate speech” convictions are very common in France for anyone who speaks critically about immigration, thanks to the breadth of the laws in place. The Jews lobbied for these laws and it is usually Jewish-dominated associations who bring the prosecutions or complaints.

Soon it will be outlawed for right wingers to even run for President of France, as put forth by the Jews in France.

This is why people in the Alt Right like to harp on about the Jews. An obsession with the Holocaust, a completely irrational unwillingness to even listen to Holocaust revisionism (which is fascinating stuff considering those 6 million numbers always get rolled back dramatically when one takes a tiny microscopic look at the science, but suggesting that fewer deaths is a good thing makes one a bad guy), and an equally destructive obsession with telling whites of European descent that they’re desire for self-preservation is racist.

Proud Muslims are more than willing to admit that they desire to conquer the West. 

Screenshot (518)

And yet many French and other Europeans refuse to even hear the more than obvious battle cry.

Muslims love to play the part of the victim even when they have been the main perpetrators of aggression in nearly every single scenario whites are told to feel guilt for. Whites are routinely taught to feel guilty for the Crusades, even though they were a defense against centuries of Islamic aggression toward Europe. Whites are also told to feel guilt for the trans-Atlantic slave trade of blacks, even though blacks have been pretty damn good at enslaving each other and the Islamic slave trade of blacks was larger and ten times more brutal. Whites are told that their centuries of colonialism was brutal and awful and genocidal, while the Turkish Empire did just as much colonizing. And they never teach whites what goods colonialism brought to the world such as higher GDP, education, literacy rates, modern medicine, better birthrates, highways, cars, etc.

The knowledge that the Greatest Generation died in the gutters of Europe so that Europeans could willingly hand over their civilizations to those who openly and proudly seek to destroy it with their inbreeding and low IQ entitled and medieval barbarian populations is the kind of thing that keeps me up at night.

And don’t try telling me otherwise. The name Saffie has been stuck in my head now for over a week.


She died in the Manchester bombing. She was eight years old.

If our little girls aren’t worth being called racist for just to protect them, then what are we protecting?