Australian Protectionist Party | A Voice for Australian Nationalists | 27Crows Radio

Australian Protectionist Party | A Voice for Australian Nationalists | 27Crows Radio

Video Version:


Audio version available HERE!

In This Episode We Discuss:

  • 00:57 How Bradley became a nationalist
  • 6:27 How the Australian Protectionist Party was founded
  • 10:53 Thoughts on the monetary system
  • 13:11 APP’s key concerns for the future of Australia
  • 18:47 Australia’s previous infrastructure
  • 21:31 How foreigners harm local labor
  • 27:22 How Australia is becoming anti-white
  • 30:33 The white guilt taking place in Australia`

APP’s Twitter:

Pelosi doth reveal too much?

ZOG wants all 11 million or nothing at all.

Sen Joe Manchin, D-WVa., criticized House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi for her response to President Trump’s immigration plan that she called a blue print to “make America white again.”

Trump’s proposal would offer a path to citizenship for 1.8 million so-called “Deamers.” He would insist on $25 billion in funding for a border wall and security. The proposal also called for a crackdown on chain migration and the diversity visa lottery program.

Pelosi wrote in a statement on Friday that the 50 percent cut to legal immigration and the “recent announcements to end Temporary Protected Status for Central Americans and Haitians are both part of the same cruel agenda. They are part of the Trump administration’s unmistakable campaign to make America white again.”

She tweeted the comment.

Manchin, who was on CNN’s ‘State of the Union,’ said we “don’t need that type of rhetoric on either side, from Nancy, (Speaker) Paul Ryan or anybody else.”

Reuters reported that Manchin is a leader of a bipartisan Senate group that is working on an immigration solution.

The Senate’s top Democrat, Chuck Schumer of New York, dismissed Trump’s plan Friday as a “wish list” for hard-liners. He acknowledged the bipartisan common ground on protections for the immigrants now shielded by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA.

But he accused Trump of using them as “a tool to tear apart our legal immigration system and adopt the wish list that anti-immigration hardliners have advocated for years.”

Remember when Nancy Pelosi criticizes immigration reform that would bring more whites to the USA or allow whites to change demographics in their favor, she is directly calling for demographic replacement of whites. It might be a cliché to say it at this point, but replace the word white with any other race and this kind of comment would be considered horrible and unacceptable. But the normalization of claiming whites owing anything of their own being white supremacy is essentially an effort to remove them then claim it’s not happening because “white isn’t a thing,” or so-called “studies” professors preach to their students.

Pelosi should have retired by now, but claims she’ll stick around as though it’s a threat, not a choice because she sees her efforts now as fighting against an authoritarian system. Remember that meme of that blonde chick in Game of Thrones being held up by a bunch of non-whites in a glorious crowd surfing image? Yeah, that’s who Pelosi thinks she is.


If only she realized that the people of color she wants to bring in would throw her under a bus at the first opportunity. A few months ago they screamed “all 11 million” over her at a speech so loud that she had to leave. But she still fights for them. The woman is either deliberately dishonest or completely blind.

And don’t even get me started on weepy (((Chuck Schumer))), who thinks Obama’s written ban on Islamic nations is perfectly alright until it’s put forth by Trump. If there are any hard liners here, it’s Democrats who want all Dreamers and all 11 million right now or nothing at all. Which they proved when they shut down the government for….illegals! Not better schools or veteran programs. Illegals!

For those black pilled over Trump offering 1.8 million “Dreamers” for the wall, what seems to have actually happened in that he’s showcasing just how much Democrats don’t give a shit about fixing immigration. Or helping the American people for that matter. This is the rock they’ve chosen to die on. The right of low IQ Haitians to come here with no skills and supposedly become brain surgeons. They want as many non-whites as possible as fast as possible to improve their chances of winning elections. Because who’s the majority that votes right? Predominantly whites. And they know it. So replace them as fast as possible.   

San Fransicko Doubles Down on Steinle Family

So San Francisco willingly allows illegals  to stay in their city in order to virtue signal, but denies any moral responsibility for what those illegals do? Why am I not surprised?

The U.S. government and the City of San Francisco are asking Kate Steinle’s family to dismiss the wrongful death lawsuit in a hearing on Friday.

Kate Steinle was shot and killed in July of 2015 on Pier 14 along San Francisco’s waterfront. Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, an undocumented immigrant, has been charged in the murder.

Lopez-Sanchez was released from the San Francisco City Jail in Apil.

The family of Kate Steinle filed the federal lawsuit in May of 2016 against former San Francisco sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, Immigration and Custom’s Enforcement, and the Bureau of Land Management.

The lawsuit seeks to hold the Bureau of Land Management, ICE, and former Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi accountable for providing “the means and opportunity for a repeat drug felon to secure a gun and kill Kate,” according to the complaint.

Mirkarimi refused to hold Lopez-Sanchez for ICE, citing San Francisco’s sanctuary city law.

Kate Steinle’s parents argue the gunman would have been kept in custody and deported if the city and federal officials had done their jobs.

If you allow criminals into your house and someone gets killed, you’re responsible for allowing those criminals inside with a smile on your face. But this kind of common sense is lost in cities like San Fransicko.

If Kate Steinle’s family stands strong and eventually wins their case, it will be a victory to help propel more immigration reform. And hopefully Kate’s Wall.