Australian Protectionist Party | A Voice for Australian Nationalists | 27Crows Radio

Video Version:


Audio version available HERE!

In This Episode We Discuss:

  • 00:57 How Bradley became a nationalist
  • 6:27 How the Australian Protectionist Party was founded
  • 10:53 Thoughts on the monetary system
  • 13:11 APP’s key concerns for the future of Australia
  • 18:47 Australia’s previous infrastructure
  • 21:31 How foreigners harm local labor
  • 27:22 How Australia is becoming anti-white
  • 30:33 The white guilt taking place in Australia`

APP’s Twitter:

Alt Right 101 | The Reality of Race | #9

Video Version:

Audio Version can be found HERE.

In This Episode We Discuss:

  • 1:33 What is the basic understanding of race realism?
  • 6:16 How race is more than skin deep
  • 12:44 The controversy regarding race and IQ
  • 16:10 The argument of outliers and averages
  • 21:33 Emotional responses from the left to racial realities
  • 31:12 Unrealistic expectations for IQ growth
  • 34:40 Accusations of superiority and censorship of facts
  • 43:44 What can we learn from race realism

A BANNED Argument for Human Subspecies

This video was banned from YouTube, but uploaded to Bitchute.

I once had a former friend who called me up to end the friendship because I made the same claim from this video on my blog. That the human race has subspecies. We have different IQ’s, different immune systems, different brain sizes, different skeletal structures when examined by modern scientific study of genomes. But claiming such in a world driven by fanatical egalitarianism is heresy, punishable by deplatforming, firing from one’s job, public humiliation, and so forth. 

Human biodiversity is the new plate tectonics. It’s the new evolution. Both of which were controversial when they were first proposed as legitimate science. And it’s my sincere hope that one day saying you don’t believe in human biodiversity, will be held in the same regard as those who might still claim that the Earth is indeed flat.

Here’s a link to the video, narrated by Tara McCarthy.


When the owner of a Dairy Queen has to defend his choice to say that he supports “God and country”, you know we’ve progressed into #ClownUniverse.

A Wisconsin Dairy Queen owner is defending a sign describing his restaurant as “politically incorrect” for its unabashed support for “God and country.”

The sign at the franchise in Kewaskum notifies patrons that staff may say “Merry Christmas,” ”Happy Easter” and “God Bless America,” among other things.

Owner Kevin Scheunemann tells WDJT-TV he “felt the sign was appropriate to hang in terms of being transparent about the views of the owner and staff supporting God and country.”

One customer who apparently doesn’t agree took a picture of the sign and complained about it on Dairy Queen’s page on Facebook.

The chain tells the station the sign “expresses the views of this independent owner only” and doesn’t speak for the company or any other franchise owners.

This on the same day that Portland Oregon’s police department decided to get rid of their list of gang members because it might incite racial hatred given that it was mostly composed of minorities.

Portland police will no longer maintain a database of suspected gang members, due to concerns that the vast majority of people with the gang label are racial minorities.

Starting Oct. 15, the Portland Police Bureau will end the 20-year practice of issuing gang member designations, which police say can lead to “unintended consequences” and a lifelong stigma even for those who have given up the gang lifestyle. Officials intend to notify the approximately 300 people on the gang list that the bureau will purge all records related to the designations, The Oregonian reported.

“There are still criminal gang members. That doesn’t go away because we don’t have a gang designation,” said Capt. Mike Krantz, according to The Oregonian. “We’re not pretending gang violence doesn’t exist. We’re just taking this one thing away.”

I guess the gangs just weren’t white enough for them to think it was a matter of concern. It might also verify racial “stereotypes” that we now have scientific evidence for. Oops.

But Dairy Queen owners who support their god and their country are clearly out of line.

The saying “facts are racist” just doesn’t cut it.

#ClownUniverse is the only way to describe it.



Murray speaks at Harvard

There was a time when things such as evolution and plate tectonics were considered taboo and anyone who spoke of these concepts were black listed as radicals. Race realism is the new evolution.

I first became familiar with Charles Murray when he did an interview with Stefan Molyneux. Speaking of the link between race and IQ cost Murray dearly. And it was published over twenty years ago. 

It’s only when white liberals have personal experiences of being surrounded by other races that they sometimes (certainly not always, but sometimes) learn that there is a definite difference between us.

Until then, they continue to call those trying to start the discussion the usual names. Hateful. Bigots. Racist. Etc…

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Students gathered at Harvard University on Wednesday to denounce a speech by an author who co-wrote a book discussing racial differences in intelligence and touched off a boisterous protest earlier this year in Vermont.

Chanting “black, brown, Asian, white, Harvard united for human rights” and “you can’t turn us around,” dozens of students stood on the front lawn of the university’s Museum of Natural History to protest the appearance of Charles Murray as his speech got underway inside.

Murray, a political scientist who co-authored the 1994 book “The Bell Curve,” has said his views are misunderstood. His speech on Wednesday was closed to the media.

Student speakers, part of the organizing Black Students Association and the Undergraduate Council’s Black Caucus, condemned what they say is Murray’s hateful rhetoric, which they believe is an attack on the existence of minorities.

“He’s trying to whitewash our existence,” said Ian Hayes, a 19-year-old sophomore. “He isn’t misunderstood, he’s wrong — plain and simple.”

One of the organizers of the demonstration, Anwar Omeish, a 21-year-old junior from Fairfax, Virginia, said Murray’s ideas are “flawed.”

“If it’s about contributions to global conversations, his is not a particularly worthy one,” Omeish said.

A parallel talk at the university’s northwest building, involving professors and students, was held shortly after the demonstration. The professors identified Murray as an empirically discredited and overtly racist speaker whose work is heavily reliant on biological determinism.

Murray’s speech at Vermont’s Middlebury College in March prompted a demonstration that involved up to eight masked people. A Middlebury professor suffered a neck injury during a subsequent physical confrontation. Dozens of students were disciplined.

Murray’s Harvard appearance was sponsored by the Open Campus Initiative, a student-run group that advocates free expression and has been inviting provocative speakers.

The Southern Poverty Law Center labels Murray a white nationalist, but he denies that.

One thing is certain. Don’t send your kids to college unless they’re going for a STEM degree. Some say we need to take over these institutions. But when I read articles such as this showcasing students who aren’t even able to listen to contradictory ideas without mouthing off the same rhetoric they’re liberal professors teach them, it makes me think that these institutions aren’t worth saving. Let them fall. We can create new ones from the ashes of the old. 

We used to go to university to learn new ideas. Now we go to destroy them. But race realism won’t die. Because as long as we don’t discuss race realism in a realistic way, we won’t come anywhere close to solving the problems that plague our societies.



Racial Differences Broken Down, Then BANNED

Jared Taylor, in classic Jared-esque form, broke down the differences between the races, calmly, intellectually, biologically, genetically… and politely.

So naturally it was banned from YouTube. Or shadow banned rather.

Race Realism/human biodiversity is the new evolution. Those who dared to discuss evolution or even plate tectonics decades or over a century ago were deemed completely insane. Their work was threatened and some even prayed for their heretical souls. Now, both those sciences are widely accepted and respected.

Jared Taylor is a brave man who is before his time. I hope one day he will be regarded as the leader who dared push boundaries to protect the interests of those who don’t even realize that they do in fact have interests.

Follow the link below to see the video. It’s been posted on Bitchute, where my videos will be soon.

Yes, IQ is genetic

My parents can feed me all the meat and veggies in the world as a kid and it might make me grow an extra inch or two. But I still had a max point of growth. As it happens, IQ is the same.

How smart you are doesn’t depend on how your parents raised you, a new study concludes.

Their reading to you, talking with you at the dinner table and taking an active interest in your life could make you happy. And that’s important. But it won’t make you smarter, says Kevin Beaver.

As a criminologist, he studies the causes of crime and ways to prevent it. Beaver works at Florida State University in Tallahassee. His research team wanted to know if different parenting styles influenced a child’s intelligence. After all, Beaver notes, “intelligence has been linked to crime.”

Previous research has suggested different types of parenting could affect a child’s IQ. Short for intelligence quotient, IQ is a score that measures human intelligence.

But those earlier data hadn’t separated out the effect of genetics on IQ. Beaver’s team wanted to know: Are children’s IQ scores really affected by how their parents raised them? Or are those scores just a reflection of what genes a child inherited?

To find out, the team pored over information from a study of more than 15,000 U.S. middle- and high-school students. It’s called the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

Beaver’s group was especially interested in results from a group of about 220 students who had been adopted. The parents who raised them had not passed on any genes to them. So if there was a link between the students’ IQs and the way their parents raised them, the researchers should see it most clearly in the adopted students’ scores.

But no such link emerged. Whether students reported their parents cared about them and did things with them — or reported that they did not — it had no impact on the their IQ. This means a person’s IQ is largely the result of the genes we inherit from our biological parents.

Regression to the mean is real. The fall of the west if whites disappear is a real. Lower IQ and higher crime rate is real. Race is real. Get used to it, because I’m going to keep on saying it.

If the roots dies, the branches die. Then the entire tree dies. End of story.