Immigration is Cancer

We hear it all the time. Diversity is our strength. Immigration is an act of kindness. The truth is that immigration is conquest. Immigration is warfare. And Mexico is directly trying to conquer the United States. They may succeed.

Mexicans do not assimilate. Many of them feel that they’re entitled to our land due to past conflicts between Hispanics and whites. They will gaslight you and say you’re being paranoid or that whites aren’t disappearing and you’re just scared of people of color.

I can’t even go to a restaurant or a grocery store without hearing Spanish. And to speak out against the U.S. being a bilingual country is considered racist. Why? So that whites in general will feel guilty for wanting to maintain a culture of their own. Because whites aren’t allowed to have a culture. Or we’re told that we don’t have one to begin with.

Don’t buy it. This is pure conquest. 

2 thoughts on “Immigration is Cancer

  1. It is strange that whites are the minority in the world, but are told by the libtards that we can not be racist against! This is an aspect of why the right is rising! #Europarising

  2. The West has fallen prey to an IDEOLOGY of white racial self-denial and self-contempt, which begs an explanation.

    In a nutshell, it is an overreaction to Nazism and the Holocaust.

    In an editorial response, The Price of Fear, to the Islamic terror attacks on Paris in November 2015, the NYT gave the following warning:

    “In the reaction and overreaction to terrorism [evil] comes the risk that society will lose its way.”

    Who could deny that in regard to race, western society has indeed lost its way? And an overreaction to the evil of Nazism and the Holocaust (reinforced by guilt regarding European imperialism, slavery and Jim Crow), I believe, is the reason for it.

    This overreaction should have been recognised and corrected long ago, but hasn’t been, because it quickly became part of the state’s age-old strategy of divide and rule, whereby society is divided into a morally superior, now supposedly unprejudiced, “colour-blind” and xenophilic elite, on the one hand, and the morally inferior, naturally (evolved human nature being what it is) prejudiced, not colour-blind, but xenophobically-inclined masses, on the other, who must submit to the authority of and domination by their “moral superiors”.

    I elaborate on these ideas in my blog: http://philosopherkin.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/political-implications-of-evolutionary.html

Leave a reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s