HRC plays the pussy card. Again.

Muh Russia and muh Comey and muh misogyny still prevail!

Hillary Clinton delivered her most forceful critique of President Donald Trump’s 2016 victory on Tuesday, taking personal responsibility for her failed campaign but also pointed to the timing of a letter from FBI Director James Comey and Russian interference as factors.


It was indeed a thing of beauty. Comey’s letter couldn’t have been better timed. But then again, everyone who took that letter seriously were people who already knew she was a crook. Those already voting for her really didn’t care.

“If the election had been on October 27, I would be your president,” she told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour at a Women for Women event in New York. “I take absolute personal responsibility. I was the candidate, I was the person who was on the ballot. I am very aware of the challenges, the problems, the shortfalls that we had,” Clinton said, before adding that she was “on the way to winning until a combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me and got scared off.”

Wait wait wait… so she takes full responsibility, but Comey and Russia? That’s not taking full responsibility, sweetheart.

Clinton, who is currently writing a book that partly reflects on her 2016 loss, added, “The reason I believe we lost were the intervening events in the last 10 days.”
The event marks the latest where Clinton, in a stinging rebuke to Trump, both blames herself for the 2016 loss but also casts the current President as someone aided by outside factors, including the Russian government.

So Trump blasts Syria, a Russian ally, and threatens to indict Julian Assange who helped to get him elected via those same Wikileaks but he’s still entwined with the Russians?
Oh for the love of god…

After Clinton noted the 3 million more votes she won than Trump, Amanpour joked that the President would soon tweet about the comment.
“Fine. Better than the interfering in foreign affairs,” Clinton said. “If he wants to tweet about me than I am happy to be the diversion because we have lot of things to worry about. He should worry less about the election and my winning the popular vote than doing some other things that would be important for the country.”

Did she honestly say “better than interfering in foreign affairs?” You murdered Gaddafi, the leader of Libya! You single handedly caused the migrant crisis wreaking havoc in Europe right now through foreign intervention! Not to mention that the U.S. has openly interfered with many foreign elections. Obama told the British that they should vote for the Remain campaign. And that’s only a small example.

Clinton, aides and friends say, has grown more at peace with her loss in recent months, but is still focused on the interference by the Russian government, especially the fact that WikiLeaks began releasing John Podesta’s hacked emails hours after the damaging “Access Hollywood” Trump tape was released.

More at peace? You know that woman is suffering hard core. She looks it.

Clinton, as she has done in the past, also hung part of her 2016 loss on misogyny.
“Yes, I do think it played a role. I think other things did as well,” Clinton said.
But repeatedly, Clinton came back to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s role in the 2016 election and how he was able to tilt the scale in favor of Trump and against her.

Misogyny? Really? And yet, she claims to take personal responsibility. 53% of American women voted for Trump. That’s a lot of self-hating misogynistic women. Or maybe… just maybe… they saw you as the conniving murderer that you are! You belong in prison! Whatever happened to “Lock Her Up”? We need to make that trend again.
Killary once again plays the pussy card.
DENIED!

One thought on “HRC plays the pussy card. Again.

  1. I am so amused by the “I take full responsibility for this. It was his fault and his fault, and those self-hating women who didn’t vote for me just because I am woman.”

    There are those who have feelings and those who think other people make them feel things. We cannot coexist with such a fundamentally different epistemology.

Leave a reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s