Madonna under investigation

The woman who thinks it’s hot for a sixty year old to offer blow jobs to men so they will vote for Killary is now speaking up about her fantasies of blowing up the White House.

The U.S. Secret Service will reportedly open an investigation into Madonna after the singer told demonstrators at the Women’s March on Washington Saturday that she has often thought of “blowing up the White House.”

During a profanity-laced speech at the protest rally in Washington, D.C. Saturday, the 58-year-old “Rebel Heart” singer said she had felt “angry” and “outraged” over Donald Trump becoming the country’s 45th president.

“I’m angry. Yes, I’m outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” Madonna said. “But I know that this won’t change anything. We cannot fall into despair.”

A spokesman for the Secret Service reportedly told The Gateway Pundit that the agency was “aware” of the singer’s comments and would open an investigation, though the final decision on whether to prosecute would be made by the U.S. Attorney’s office.

Madonna performed two songs during her appearance at the Women’s March, “Express Yourself” and “Human Nature.”

During “Human Nature,” the singer changed the song’s lyrics to include “Donald Trump, suck a d***.”

Madonna’s comments aired uncensored on several cable TV networks, leading to apologies from some on-air anchors.

Madonna was one of several celebrities who participated in Saturday’s march. Other stars on hand included Alicia Keys, Amy Schumer, Ashley Judd, Scarlet Johansson, Cher, Julia Roberts and Katy Perry.

Madonna was one of Trump’s biggest celebrity antagonists during the election. In October, the pop star offered to perform oral sex on anyone who voted for former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

I don’t know what’s funnier about this whole situation. That it might actually blow up in Madonna’s face or that she thinks she still has influence over people. Remember, this is the same idiot that flashed her tit at a concert in Turkey. A predominantly Muslim country. Yes, there are some Christians, but come on.

I’ve never been a fan. I’ve never even found her halfway likable or attractive. In fact, I think she’s a shining example of what women shouldn’t become. All the women listed above are what women should avoid. How many of them are divorced? How many of them don’t have kids? How many of them have been victims of feminism and the thought or idea that men are disposable?

When I hear them protesting over how women are abused in the Middle East and how we shouldn’t allow that regressive culture to come here to the U.S. (which is exactly what Killary wanted to do and she claimed she would let 500x more “migrants” into the country) then I’ll change my tune. But I highly doubt that honor killings, acid being thrown in women’s faces, child marriages, female genitalia mutilation, no rights to drive a car, and being forced to wear a burka qualify as issues they should protest. They would turn around and tell us right wingers that we’re ethnocentric and that we should learn to respect a regressive culture that actually has no respect for women at all and would make good on their pursuit of stripping women of their rights.

I hope the Secret Service pursues Madonna and she’s formally charged with something. I don’t even know what. But anything that will show the left that their threats will be taken seriously and rioting in the streets will be seen as what it is. A crime. Conservatives that haven’t shown a backbone in the past when it comes to the full extent of the law for these rioters need to step up.

They should be charged yesterday.

 

Not Partisan My Ass

Yesterday, I did the unthinkable. I went to one of these Women’s Marches. I will have more about that for you at a later time. But here are some thoughts on the Women’s Marches from a liberal who voted for Trump.

Former WSJ reporter Asra Nomani asks in the NYT’s “Women In the World” section what is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the Women’s March? Her answer: “as it turns out, it’s quite significant.

After hearing consistently that one of Black Lives Matter’s biggest donors and pushers is George Soros, this doesn’t particularly surprise me. It’s already been revealed through the Wikileaks that the left wing organizations were busing people in to riot in cities during BLM protests and James O’Keefe’s ‘Project Veritas’ videos provided evidence that the DNC deliberately sent in instigators to disrupt Trump rallies to portray his supporters as violent.

Here is what else she discovered.
Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington.

Not shocking. What hasn’t this man done to push the fall of Western civilization and general unrest?

In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the “Women’s March on Washington”? The Guardian has touted the “Women’s March on Washington” as a “spontaneous” action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the “huge, spontaneous groundswell” behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as “a grassroots effort” with “independent” organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, “The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.”It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace.

Giving the appearance that these protests are a natural uprising to the general unrest surrounding Trump’s inauguration is critical to the MSM’s narrative that the people don’t approve of Trump. Sure, there are millions who don’t. But perception is key here. The more it appears as though these protests are a natural thing that the people organized rather than something George Soros threw money at, the more blue pillers will believe it.

But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a “women’s march.” It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump. As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcomenixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agendaTo understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are “partners” of the march. Is this a non-partisan “Women’s March”? Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association, a march “partner,” told me his organization was “nonpartisan” but has “many concerns about the incoming Trump administration that include what we see as a misogynist approach to women.”

The march I went to yesterday was all anti-Trump. Every single one of them was showcasing ‘solidarity’ against Trump. There were signs saying “safe abortions” and “LGBTQ Rights.” I can’t imagine the hell fire that would have come down if it was revealed that I, a pro-lifer and an AltRighter, was among them. These kinds of protests only have room for the women who agree with them. Women on the left will spout “tolerance” and “love” and “acceptance” of other cultures and beliefs to the point where your ears will bleed. But that tolerance ends when you don’t agree with them. Half the population of women in the U.S. are pro-life, and less than 20% identify as a feminist. The more exposure third wave feminism gets as a regressive movement that has made women progressively less happy since women’s liberation, and the more social justice warriors shit on white men, the fewer women identify with feminism. Thank goodness.

Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, “This is not a ‘partisan’ event.” Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march “partner,” returned my call and said, “This is not a partisan march.”
Really? UnitedWomen.org, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama. Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”? I found out: plenty.

As someone who went to a march with thousands of people yesterday, I can confirm, it was extremely partisan. Not a single person was wearing a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat. They would have been attacked.

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.  

Not shocking. Not even in the least. These are all organizations that are committed to keeping their doors open. They will fund any unrest they possibly can to intimidate others into silence. And have done so in the past.

When there’s societal unrest in the form of protests and riots pertaining to the left, you can count on any of these organizations to have their greasy hands on it. And somewhere in the pile of dirty hands are those of George Soros.